You’re running into a common scenario when dealing with Camunda variable serialization. Let’s tackle both of your questions in turn:
1. Why use Variables.objectValue(...).serializationDataFormat(...)
instead of setting the value directly?
You’re right that in many cases you can just do:
execution.setVariable("varName", productDetails)
But the explicit approach using Variables.objectValue(...)
is used for control and clarity around serialization. Here’s the breakdown:
When to use the explicit Variables.objectValue()
form:
- You want to explicitly specify the serialization format (e.g., JSON vs. Java Serialized Object).
- You want to avoid fallback to default Java serialization, which is what Camunda may use when it doesn’t know how to serialize a complex type.
- You’re storing custom classes or complex types, and you want to ensure they’re portable and readable (e.g., for Cockpit, REST API, etc).
Why the direct approach may not always work:
- If Camunda doesn’t know how to serialize the object, or can’t infer a format, it may default to
application/x-java-serialized-object
. - This leads to exactly the kind of issue you’re now trying to avoid: non-human-readable format, class loading issues, etc.
So in summary:
You can use the short version if you’re confident that your object is simple (e.g.,
Map<String, String>
), and that Camunda’s default object mapper is properly configured to serialize it as JSON.
But for robustness and clarity, it’s best to be explicit—especially in a production system or when dealing with process variables that might be viewed in Cockpit or via REST.
2. How to deserialize x-java-serialized-object
manually to see its contents in Java?
Yes, you can deserialize it using Java’s ObjectInputStream
. Here’s how you can do it manually:
import java.io.*;
import java.util.Map;
public class DeserializeCamundaObject {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// This is your serialized base64 string from Camunda
String base64Serialized = "rO0ABXNyABFqYXZhLnV0aWwuSGFzaE1hcAAAAAAAAAABDAAAeHB3BAAAAAB4";
// Decode base64 to bytes
byte[] data = java.util.Base64.getDecoder().decode(base64Serialized);
// Deserialize
try (ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(data))) {
Object obj = ois.readObject();
// Now you can cast and inspect it
if (obj instanceof Map) {
Map<?, ?> map = (Map<?, ?>) obj;
System.out.println("Deserialized Map:");
map.forEach((k, v) -> System.out.println(k + " -> " + v));
} else {
System.out.println("Deserialized Object: " + obj);
}
}
}
}
Important Notes:
- This only works if the classes involved are present on the classpath. If the object being deserialized references a custom class, that class must be available.
- It’s a good idea to move away from this format (as you plan to) and use JSON for better portability and inspection.