I have two tenants called tenantOne and tenantTwo. Process definition is same for both tenant but not process instances. So if I deploy the .bpmn file without tenant identifier and will i able to process the process-instance request with tenant identifier? Will it be possible?
Scenario is :
- ProcessDefinition without tenantIdentifier
- ProcessInstance, Tasks, and Jobs with tenantIdentifier
Is it mandatory to associate tenantIdentifier with process-definition, if we want to proceed with tenantIdentifier for ProcessInstance, Tasks, and Jobs?
Im using camunda-spring-boot-starter-rest , so i can’t provide custom implementation of TenantIDProvider interface. Everything from camunda accessed through rest api. In this case how to achieve multi tenancy for shared definitions without providing implementation of TenantIDProvider?
Hi @aravindhrs,
in spring-boot you can use a @Component annotation to change the process engine configuration: https://docs.camunda.org/manual/7.9/user-guide/spring-boot-integration/configuration/#adding-additional-configurations.
I havn’t tried it with a tenantIdProvider but with a parse listener. It should be the same pattern.
Hope this helps, Ingo
Changing process engine configuration will not result in cretaion of new process engine right? i meant is it possible to modify default process engine?
Yes, you can modify the configuration of the default process engine. Have a look at this chapter about the background: https://docs.camunda.org/manual/7.9/user-guide/process-engine/process-engine-bootstrapping/
I had a similar use case and created a simple example about what @Ingo_Richtsmeier suggested.
Maybe this helps anyone!